By EW Staff
October 25, 2005 at 12:00 PM EDT

Seattle Post-Intelligencer TV critic Melanie McFarland does not like Martha Stewart and Tyra Banks’ new daytime talk shows — and she ain’t afraid to say it. She makes two very interesting, overarching points about Martha and The Tyra Banks Show: that Martha Stewart (near left) is not such a good interviewer (true), and that Banks’ program is overstuffed with her own narcissism (also true).

But I think she just needs to embrace the new daytime surrealism. Anyone who watched Martha suck the head off a crawfish while dazed-and-confused guests Ben Vereen and Liza Minnelli tried to corral a writhing mass of hundreds of live mini-lobsters hellbent on escaping from Martha’s kitchen/laboratory knows that Martha packs more humor into one hour (albeit unintentional humor) than, say, two episodes of Arrested Development.

And I’ll get into the confessional for a minute and admit that, yes, I watched the infamous Tyra “breast” episode. Among other segments, the boob-a-thon included Anna Nicole Smith pantomiming the various sizes of implants she has had using a “whoosh”-like noise and an all-bra fashion show with running commentary from a male audience member (“Me like that one. That one nice”). I kept waiting, as did McFarland, for the inevitable breast cancer segment. Instead, we saw Miss Tyra (above left) fight back tears — tears! — as she reported that it hurts her that people think her breasts aren’t real. Aw. And to prove it, she brought in a real-live doctor to check out her merchandise for any “enhancements.” It was compelling television, but in the same sense that Courtney Love is a compelling musician — fascinating, but not always worth watching.

What do you guys think? Are Martha and The Tyra Banks Show living up to the promise of their charismatic celebrity hosts?

Advertisement

Comments

EDIT POST