What repercussions will the Meg Ryan/ Russell Crowe affair have?
EW reports on office romance, Hollywood style
Unless you spent last summer blindfolded in a cellar, you pretty much know the plot of ”Proof of Life,” right? It’s about this adorable blond movie star who’s got a happy Hollywood marriage to a hunky fellow actor. She flies to Ecuador to shoot a movie and winds up having a fling with this macho Richard Burtonish bloke. It wreaks havoc on her marriage. The tabloids go bonkers. The drama!
Oh, wait. That’s actually the story BEHIND the making of Warner Bros.’ December kidnapping thriller ”Proof of Life,” starring Meg Ryan and Russell Crowe — although you’re forgiven for confusing real life with their movie’s plot. At this point the very title ”Proof of Life” is inextricably tangled up with tales of Ryan and Crowe’s on set summer lovin’, photos of the snuggly duo hand in hand, and a heartbreaking divorce suit from Ryan’s hubby, Dennis Quaid. (Ryan has since also filed for divorce, along with shared custody of the couple’s only child, Jack Henry, 8. None of the threesome would comment.)
Actors like to joke that romance doesn’t count when it’s on a movie set. Tell that to the studio footing the bill; Warner Bros. ponied up a reported $15 million to sign Ryan alone. Now it has to market a film whose central character relationship morphed into a global scandale d’amour. The problem has its precedents — and its varying outcomes. Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton’s adulterous passion nearly dethroned 1963’s ”Cleopatra,” igniting a scandal that contributed to a less than imperial gross. (The $44 million epic didn’t break even until years later.)
Ali McGraw and Steve McQueen’s home wrecking — at the expense of famed ”Godfather” producer Robert Evans, McGraw’s then husband — nearly sent ”The Getaway” careening off course in 1972, but it recovered to nab a healthy (for the times) $40 million. Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman set off sparks on the set of 1990’s ”Days of Thunder” hot on the heels of his separation from wife Mimi Rogers, but the film raced to $166 million worldwide. So this isn’t uncharted territory. ”People have set romances all the time,” says one studio publicist. ”Especially when they’re sent to Ecuador and they happen to be really pretty and really handsome — and really lonely.”
But what happens when the actress has forged a career as America’s sweetheart? Warner must be wondering whether Ryan’s offscreen behavior shatters her ”girl next door” image. The studio refuses to comment, but insiders predict Ryan and Crowe — who are under contract to publicize the film — will make very separate publicity appearances, under a blanket refusal to answer personal questions. And Warner is unlikely to exploit the romance, most agree. ”’Any press is good press’ is a thoroughly wrong statement,” says celebrity publicist Eddie Michaels. ”And for a studio to consciously use someone’s rumored personal situation as part of their marketing plan would be completely unethical.”
Which doesn’t mean Warner Bros. won’t tangentially benefit from all the titillating talk: Public curiosity (and private chemistry) may give ”Proof” life. Crowe and Ryan, says a studio marketing exec, ”must have had something pretty good if it came off the screen and became real.” ”Loveline” relationship expert and ”Big Brother” adviser Dr. Drew agrees: ”I had no interest in this film until I heard about all of this,” he admits. ”People will want to see if they can pick up on her falling in love with him on screen.”
The curiosity factor comes into play with November’s ”Bounce,” which pairs America’s Oscar winning ”are they or aren’t they” couple, Gwyneth Paltrow and Ben Affleck — to the likely delight of their benefactor Miramax. Director Don Roos is planning how to juggle the inevitable questions. ”Maybe I should just play ignorant,” he laughs. ”’I have no idea what’s going on!”’
Sparks indicate heat — which studios like — but there’s always a chance of getting burned: A complicated relationship makes for complicated PR planning. ”You could book [an appearance] this week, and everything’s on — and next week? Ouch,” says the marketing exec.
Miramax admits even the hottest (or hot and coldest) couple won’t get people into seats simply because of public voyeurism. ”You look at the movies couples are in, and when they’ve been couples in a really good film, they work,” says Miramax publicity president Marcy Granata. ”The offscreen stuff — I don’t know if it matters.”
Maybe, but viewers who want to debate the state of the Ben/ Gwyn union may head to ”Bounce” just to see if they can spot an understanding. ”When you take a couple who’s on again, off again, things get much more interesting,” says the marketing exec. ”It’s the tension that makes it interesting for an audience.”
Then it may be lucky that the affiancéd Catherine Zeta-Jones and Michael Douglas share no screen time in December’s ”Traffic.” ”Once people are married, it’s like, eh,” says marketing analyst Tony Angellotti. ”Married people know there’s no more sexual tension when people are married — you’re not going to fool them.”
(Additional reporting by William Keck)