About Your Privacy on this Site
Welcome! To bring you the best content on our sites and applications, Meredith partners with third party advertisers to serve digital ads, including personalized digital ads. Those advertisers use tracking technologies to collect information about your activity on our sites and applications and across the Internet and your other apps and devices.
You always have the choice to experience our sites without personalized advertising based on your web browsing activity by visiting the DAA’s Consumer Choice page, the NAI's website, and/or the EU online choices page, from each of your browsers or devices. To avoid personalized advertising based on your mobile app activity, you can install the DAA’s AppChoices app here. You can find much more information about your privacy choices in our privacy policy. Even if you choose not to have your activity tracked by third parties for advertising services, you will still see non-personalized ads on our sites and applications. By clicking continue below and using our sites or applications, you agree that we and our third party advertisers can:
  • transfer your data to the United States or other countries; and
  • process and share your data so that we and third parties may serve you with personalized ads, subject to your choices as described above and in our privacy policy.
Entertainment Weekly


EW debates the most polarizing issues of the small-screen in 2017

Clockwise from top left: Jack Rowand/The CW(3); Bob Mahoney/The CW; Ken Woroner/BBC AMERICA; Netflix; HBO; Hulu; Chris Haston/NBC; Jack Rowand/The CW

Posted on

America is more divided than ever — and how we watch TV is no exception. Below, James Hibberd and Natalie Abrams debate some of the most polarizing big issues of the small-screen from 2017.

Originals vs. Reboots
JAMES: Sure this is the Peak Reboot era. But biggest and best shows are still almost always original ideas. Reboots like CW’s Dynasty, NBC’s Taken, Fox’s 24: Legacy, etc. only proved a hit’s magic wasn’t its concept, but having a perfect cast and execution at the right time.
NAT: Sorry, what’d you say? I was busy watching NBC’s top-rated comedy of the fall, Will & Grace.

Closure vs. Mystery
NAT: No series finale will ever satisfy every viewer, so I love endings that give us just a general sense of the future — like in the case of The Vampire Diaries and Orphan Black — leaving the rest up to the audience’s imagination.
JAMES: I’m down for some open-ended uncertainty — such as never knowing for sure if Nora was telling the truth in The Leftovers finale (she totally was) — but a show owes its audience most of their big questions answered after asking them to watch for dozens of hours; that’s just polite.

Spoilers vs. Surprises
NAT: Spoilers only heighten the anticipation, if only to then see how the big moment really plays out on screen. Proof: Even though I knew Viserion was going to perish on Game of Thrones, I still sobbed when the dragon was slaughtered by the Night King.
JAMES: Hey, spoiler alert, not everybody has watched season 7 yet! “Heighten anticipation”? More like ruins suspense! Avoiding spoilers means surrendering yourself to a story and allowing its creators to guide your experience rather than using a cheat-sheet to buffer an emotional journey.

Yearly vs. Waiting
NAT: Why is it that we’ve gone an entire year without new episodes of Westworld and we’ll be waiting nearly two years for the final season of Game of Thrones — and probably Stranger Things 3, as well? Can’t networks see they infuriate audiences with such long hiatuses?
JAMES: Have patience! If networks wants to spend two years and tens of millions to make only a handful of episodes, then we are lucky because the result will probably be awesome. Besides, does anybody feel like they need more shows to watch right now?

DC vs. Marvel:
NAT: The CW has spent years adeptly building out its rich, interconnected TV universe across The Flash, Supergirl, Arrow, and Legends of Tomorrow, leading to the network’s best four-way crossover yet with Crisis on Earth-X. (It was legitimately better than Justice League.)
JAMES: “Better than Justice League” isn’t exactly high praise. I’ll admit this was Marvel’s worst TV year — Inhumans, Iron Fist, The Defenders, and The Punisher were all a step down from last year’s Jessica Jones. But Hulu’s Runaways is promising and… have we mentioned Jessica Jones returns in March?

Netflix vs. the Rest of TV
JAMES: The streaming service cranked out new show after show this year that became the title everybody was talking about (13 Reasons Why, GLOW, Mindhunter) while spending an insane $6 billion on programming. They’re one Game of Thrones away from running the board with their growing audience of cord cutters.
NAT: Five words: Stranger Things 2, episode 7.