About Your Privacy on this Site
Welcome! To bring you the best content on our sites and applications, Meredith partners with third party advertisers to serve digital ads, including personalized digital ads. Those advertisers use tracking technologies to collect information about your activity on our sites and applications and across the Internet and your other apps and devices.
You always have the choice to experience our sites without personalized advertising based on your web browsing activity by visiting the DAA’s Consumer Choice page, the NAI's website, and/or the EU online choices page, from each of your browsers or devices. To avoid personalized advertising based on your mobile app activity, you can install the DAA’s AppChoices app here. You can find much more information about your privacy choices in our privacy policy. Even if you choose not to have your activity tracked by third parties for advertising services, you will still see non-personalized ads on our sites and applications. By clicking continue below and using our sites or applications, you agree that we and our third party advertisers can:
  • transfer your data to the United States or other countries; and
  • process and share your data so that we and third parties may serve you with personalized ads, subject to your choices as described above and in our privacy policy.
Entertainment Weekly


Guillermo del Toro originally pitched The Shape of Water in black and white

Posted on

The Shape of Water

release date12/01/17
Movie Details
release date12/01/17

The Shape of Water, the monster romance movie opening in theaters this weekend, is pure Guillermo del Toro. It features a creature that harkens back to 1950s Universal monster movies, lavish art direction, and an underlying theme about the universal power of cinema.

Watching the movie, you get the sense that this is exactly the movie that del Toro wanted to make. And that’s true… mostly.

Speaking with EW for a feature in our latest issue, production designer Paul Austerberry recalled early discussions with del Toro about the movie’s look. At the time, the director shared one idea he wanted that ultimate didn’t make the final cut.

The project was always going to have a relatively low budget, somewhere between $10 million and $20 million depending on one detail: whether del Toro shot the movie in black and white, as he told Fox Searchlight he wanted.

“When it was in black and white, the budget was $12 million,” Austerberry said. (Del Toro put the hypothetical black-and-white budget at $16.5.) “And then Fox Searchlight said, ‘You know, if you make it color, we’ll make it $19.6 million.’ We were struggling at even $19.6 million to get it all down, so thankfully it went that way.”

Fox Searchlight

The shift to color brought in an extra dimension to the storytelling, which the crew used to tell the story on another level. All the red in the film represents love, and green signifies the future. “I was a bit nervous about the black and white, because color is such a strong element that you can play with in a story or movie to help shape the mood,”  Austerberry said. “When people see the movie, they comment a lot on the color, so I’m glad we went that way.”

When EW spoke with del Toro a few days later, he told a slightly different version of the story.

“To be disarmingly and horribly honest,” he said, “it was a pawn sacrifice. It was one of those things that I knew I was not really interested in, but I knew I needed to appear reasonable. ‘Oh, Guillermo. He’s such a nice guy. He gave up black and white.'”