Entertainment Weekly

Subscribe

Stay Connected

Subscribe

Advertise With Us

Learn More

Skip to content

Article

Our new column has critics tackling your film queries

Our new column has critics tackling your film queries. Lisa Schwarzbaum answers the first round of questions

Posted on

Reel: Michael White

Our new column has critics tackling your film queries

Do you ever have second thoughts on a movie after your review is published? — Andy
This is a great question to start off our new column, Andy, because it speaks to one of the biggest challenges in film criticism. Most critics get to see a movie only once, anywhere from months to hours before we write about it. The write-from-the-gut critic Pauline Kael made it a point of pride to see each movie one time only, trusting the initial rumblings of those influential intestines. I, like most moviegoers, emerge with strong immediate responses to the movies I see. But I prefer to think I’m also aware enough of my own personal tastes (an allergy to Jerry Bruckheimer blow-’em-ups, say, or an undue affection for foreign-language films in which no one speaks any language at all for minutes on end) to work out critical arguments sturdy enough to outlast first impressions.

When my opinions shift — sometimes after a second viewing, sometimes simply after more mulling — the movement is usually a matter of degree rather than a reversal. I still really like ”The 13th Warrior,” but probably appreciate ”Auto Focus” even more than I did last year. I still stand by my pan of ”Fight Club,” a review that prompted the most negative mail I’d received in years. And while I still don’t love ”The Matrix,” I have come to admire its dazzle much more than when I wrote about it in 1999. The movie remains a cold, shiny, mess-with-the-head visual spectacle of limited philosophical and emotional depth. But I get it now: It’s, like, whoa.

Why do movies always end with stupid scenes where the guy and gal smooch to stirring music? — Kate Floros, Pittsburgh
The answer, Kate, is simple: The stirring music is added because kissing is actually a static and unphotogenic activity on screen, not nearly as interesting as good conversation. Or sex. And the scene is at the end of the movie because happily-ever-after dramas in which lovebirds order pizza are even less interesting. You’ll notice, though, that the more exciting the kiss, the less necessary the musical accompaniment: No violins were needed when Adrien Brody smooched Halle Berry on Oscar night.

Send questions to reel_answers@ew.com, or post them below.